Psychometric validation of the Romanian Scenario-Based Dieting Self-Efficacy Scale in adults with overweight and obesity

Introduction Overweight and obesity require sustained changes in eating behaviour, yet long-term adherence to dietary recommendations remains difficult. Dieting self-efficacy, defined as confidence in managing eating-related challenges, is an important self-regulatory construct in weight management.

Psychometric validation of the Romanian Scenario-Based Dieting Self-Efficacy Scale in adults with overweight and obesity.
Asia Food Times editorial cover generated for this article. Source: Frontiers in nutrition / Europe PMC. Licence: CC BY.

Introduction Overweight and obesity require sustained changes in eating behaviour, yet long-term adherence to dietary recommendations remains difficult. Dieting self-efficacy, defined as confidence in managing eating-related challenges, is an important self-regulatory construct in weight management. This study aimed to translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Romanian version of the Scenario-Based Dieting Self-Efficacy Scale (DIET-SE) in adults with overweight and obesity. Methods A total of 509 adults from the general Romanian population completed an online survey between February and April 2026.

What the research examined

For the validation analyses, 243 participants with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 were included. The sample was randomly divided into two independent subsamples for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 123) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 120). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and construct validity through associations with intuitive eating, BMI, perceived stress, body image, self-rated health, and fruit and vegetable intake. Results EFA supported a three-factor structure consistent with the original instrument, comprising Social and Internal Factors, Negative Emotional Events, and High-Caloric Food, which explained 52.9% of the total variance. CFA provided acceptable support for this structure, with CFI = 0.935, TLI = 0.908, SRMR = 0.058, and RMSEA = 0.090.

What the findings mean

Internal consistency was good for the total scale (Cronbach's alpha = 0.872) and acceptable to good for the subscales. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.942). The DIET-SE total score showed positive correlations with the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 total score and with the Reliance on Hunger and Satiety Cues and Body-Food Choice Congruence subscales. Lower dieting self-efficacy was associated with higher BMI, greater perceived stress, larger perceived body shape, and greater discrepancy between perceived and desired body shape, while higher scores were associated with better self-rated health and higher fruit and vegetable intake. Conclusion The Romanian version of the DIET-SE demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability in adults with overweight and obesity and may be useful for assessing eating-related self-efficacy in research and clinical contexts.

Study authors: Draia D, Putnoky S, Olariu IC, Serban CL.. This report is based on the openly licensed abstract and source record and has been formatted for newsroom reading.

Original source

Frontiers in nutrition

https://europepmc.org/articles/PMC13574676

This report is prepared from the public source listed above for news and industry-information purposes. Original research, text, trademarks and images remain with their authors and rights holders; open material is used under the licence identified by its source. Rights holders may contact rights@asiafoodtimes.com with evidence of ownership, and verified concerns will be corrected or removed promptly. This article is not investment, legal, medical or nutrition advice.